The UCPEA Bargaining Team met with the University on Friday, May 30. Although the session was scheduled to begin at 1:00 p.m., the University didn't enter the room until 1:30 p.m. They entered a room full of observers!
The session focused heavily on testimony from UCPEA members, demonstrating why the University’s current inconsistent telework practices are unsustainable and how the absence of a formal policy is harming recruitment, retention, trust, and morale.
Members from across the University shared powerful firsthand accounts of how the lack of a consistent telework policy has impacted their ability to do their jobs effectively. Many spoke of being hired with clear expectations of flexibility, only to have remote options revoked without notice or justification. Testimonies highlighted how telework supports student services, reduces burnout, and allows staff to balance personal and professional responsibilities, especially in hybrid or remote-structured roles. Members emphasized that telework is not a luxury but a critical element of job functionality. Without a clear, enforceable policy, UConn risks losing qualified professionals to institutions that offer stability, flexibility, and trust in their workforce.
In response to prior feedback that the University wouldn't want to agree to be tied to follow the SEBAC telecommuting agreement because they don't have a seat at the table to bargain it, UCPEA presented a revised telework proposal that reflected the SEBAC agreement but specific to UConn. The University asked several questions which UCPEA will address in a future session.
After returning from caucus, the University proposed two changes to Article 30 (Parking). UCPEA advocated for eliminating additional parking fees for members who require handicap-designated spaces. The University rejected the proposal, with its chief negotiator stating, “Handicap spots are for physical limitations, not fiscal limitations.” Although UCPEA shared that members continue to experience a lack of accessible parking, the University insisted more ADA-compliant spaces exist than are being used and referred the issue to the Parking Committee and suggested members utilize the UConn Van Service. The University also introduced a proposal to allocate residential hall parking outside residence halls. UCPEA requested clear definitions of proximity and protections for anonymity in designated spaces. The University responded that rates would be within the “reasonable confines” of standard parking fees.
Overall, it was a productive session before heading into the summer months!
- Amber LaFontaine